[raptorstv]

I currently have 2005 Honda Accord V6, will I find the Acura ILX 2.0L auto to be much slower in comparison? I'm really bored with my Accord, as I've had this car for 7.5 years. I really like the design of this Acura and the price is within my budget. I initially wanted an Audi A4, but found that the car will cost significantly more if i want to add technology package. I'd like to hear your thoughts, thanks!

 

[cfrp]

Yes you will find it slow. Are you open to a manual transmission? Get the 2.4L ILX.

You could also look for a used Acura TL SH AWD if you are bored of the Accord.

__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

 

[osimmons]

i have an ILX tech package and yes it is pretty slow but over all its pretty well rounded. the motor is really the only down side but keep in mind its a honda, give the market time and parts will soon be readily available.

 

[Trentimus]

It won't be that bad as far as power.. you will notice a difference, however.. the ILX will be far more nimble given that it's a few hundred lbs less.. but it is 90HP difference

 

[fishy21]

Hi there. I am too thinking of the ILX. The 150 hp might be a deal breaker. How does the car drive on freeway? Does it easily get to 70-75 mph easily? My dealer says he has one on lease and he has no issues with the acceleration. And he used to be a race car driver. Would love to hear from actual owners.

My other options are the TSX for more power and luxury, or the Civic, since it's about $4k cheaper. Thanks!

 

[osimmons]

i haven't had any issues, its runs just fine just not fast.. its just as fast if not slightly quicker then a civic or any base car that you'd see driving around. It just not as powerful as what youd expect from a "luxury sports sedan"

 

[Popeye]

I hope Mendel and the boys in Torrance are paying attention to these posts ......the 2.4L should be the base engine for this car period!!!

 

[osimmons]

I hope Mendel and the boys in Torrance are paying attention to these posts ......the 2.4L should be the base engine for this car period!!!

man i wish lol

 

[cfrp]

One consideration of the 2.4 for the 2.0L is the requirement of premium gas. The 2.0L takes regular gas right?

Mileage is likely better on the 2.0L as well.

__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

 

[ILX-Fan]

MPG's from the 2.4 to 2.0 isn't that bad at all, not a huge difference, so if MPG's is why they included the 2.0 maybe it's time for it to go.

I wouldn't mind paying a bit more for gas just for a better driving experience.


2.0 = 24 (city) / 35 (hwy) / 28 (combined)

2.4 = 22 (city) / 31 (hwy) / 25 (combined)

 

[Trentimus]

If you wait to '14 they may add the 2.4 ED motor.. 180hp/180tq with 36 on a CVT.. that's on the Accord.. I'd anticipate something similar.

 

[osimmons]

One consideration of the 2.4 for the 2.0L is the requirement of premium gas. The 2.0L takes regular gas right?

Mileage is likely better on the 2.0L as well.

2.0 still takes 91-93

 

[osimmons]

If you wait to '14 they may add the 2.4 ED motor.. 180hp/180tq with 36 on a CVT.. that's on the Accord.. I'd anticipate something similar.

if they did i wanna take mine back (-____-)

 

[cfrp]

I think it would really piss off existing ILX owners if they did make the 2.4L standard and added CVT.. I really don't see that happening this coming year. Maybe in the coming years..

__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

 

[osimmons]

I think it would really piss off existing ILX owners if they did make the 2.4L standard and added CVT.. I really don't see that happening this coming year. Maybe in the coming years..

yep.... id be be livid

 

[ilx_stylez]

I dotn know about yuo guys but im not a big fan of the CVt transmission.

 

[osimmons]

I dotn know about yuo guys but im not a big fan of the CVt transmission.

whys is that?

 

[Trentimus]

Some CVTs are really notchy and take away that smooth shifting feeling. Which is an issue for city/urban driving.. Where the car is constantly trying to determine the correct gear. The feedback on the Accord's CVT so far has been positive though.

 

[AcuraPWR]

I like Continuously variable transmission's due to how they deliver more torque at lower RPM's unlike some automatic transmissions. It's good if you could care less for gears and having control over them.

 

[cfrp]

Well if you don't like CVT you could always get manual transmission. Personally I'm a manual transmission type of guy. CVT and Auto are the same to me.. Not manual.

__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote